
Rather surprisingly, it turns out that Mozilla numbers substantially false - and if they are not wrong, that used factors, the Mozilla Add-ons to tabulate to a final result should definitely be transparent.
In the first set of tests, Palant shows that FlashGot position in the top 10 is probably due to a bug in the Mozilla test setup and Add-ons to what operating system they tested, are very different to run. In the second analysis of Palant, an irregularity covers an obvious cause,-seem to have not, but it could be due to an I/O bottleneck on Mozilla test machines. In fact, although performance tests of read it later because of the error is cleared, it still (somehow!) manages record a 14% slow on Windows 7.
Palant includes both analysis with scolding Mozilla for going public with the performance data, before accurate had confirmed their test methods. It looks in any case in the light map how Mozilla was more than a little uncovered, the importance of the ecosystem of the Firefox Add-on. Tags: Adblock plus, AdblockPlus, add-on, add-ons, addon, addons, apps, browser, extension, extensions, Firefox, Firefox 4, Firefox4, Mozilla, performance, speed, test, web, Wladimir palant, WladimirPalant
没有评论:
发表评论